This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade,
which was filed against the xlibs package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Daniel Stone <email@example.com>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at 261854-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 16:26:43 +0000
From firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Jul 28 09:26:42 2004
Received: from fooishbar.org (tycho.fooishbar.org) [18.104.22.168] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BprGM-0007U9-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:26:42 -0700
Received: by tycho.fooishbar.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ADB28E9C036; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:26:42 +1000
From: Daniel Stone <email@example.com>
To: "John D. Hendrickson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
Subject: Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:01:38PM -0400, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
Two things. One, xlibs did not install files correctly. Two, all X pack=
now require a new directory structure (which I hate). Anyway the install=
does nothing to provide this new directory structure. I made a script wh=
does this which has done this for me on several machines.
Just did a "dist-upgrade" to sarge
for libs I had xlib's /usr/lib/libXft.so and a couple others in /usr/lib
These are xlibs, not usr libs, they shouldn't even have links into /usr/l=
After remaking the links the installer goofed, it worked. Somehow the
installer doesn't take into account the present / previous state when mak=
I found the ONLY reason libXft need to be in /usr/lib is due to gtk. Whi=
all else of gnome correctly uses X11R6/lib, gtk uses /usr/lib, oddly. Fix
that and you fix allot of confusion. The ./configure for gtk is just flat
wrong. And using ./configure --prefix=3DPATH won't help - becuase it is =
wrong - a goof up.
/usr/X11R6 is being moved away from by upstream and everyone else sane
because it's beyond a joke nowadays. Many things -- not just Xft;
fontconfig, Xcursor, Xrender, et al -- are in /usr/lib now. You haven't
been near specific enough. What failed? What 'goofed'? Which installer
were you using? Did you do a complete dist-upgrade? If so, why is your
xlibs package still at 4.1.0-16, which is the woody version?
Closing this bug report as utterly bogus and invalid unless submitter
provides a compelling rationale otherwise.
Daniel Stone <daniels@debian=
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debia=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----