On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:22:18PM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > There are several problems... > 1. I'm not getting "dri enabeled" or "dri disabled". If there's no DRI support in the first place, it can't be disabled due to problems. > 2. These missing symbols. These are harmless messages and this is not a bug. If the module objects were unstripped, there'd be symbols in them, but policy says to strip them, so they're stripped. > 3. A general not working of mach64 DRI on sparc. This sounds like a feature request. > I have a Mesa tree that builds in linux, previously there was some solaris > only ASM. The DRI tree still has this build problem, so I must use > another Xserver. The bug here being that the SPARC debian X server is not > usefull for this, where the I386 is. > > I'm now looking into AGP support, thought I think mach64 cards are only > PCI. Can you please restate the issue for this particular bug report? -- G. Branden Robinson | I'm a firm believer in not drawing Debian GNU/Linux | trend lines before you have data branden@debian.org | points. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Tim Ottinger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature