X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1571 - in trunk/debian: . local
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-24 11:38:45 -0500 (Thu, 24 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1571
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
Log:
Mark up "freedesktop.org" as a literal since it is a proper noun but should
not be capitalized (per Daniel Stone).
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-06-24 16:22:23 UTC (rev 1570)
+++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-06-24 16:38:45 UTC (rev 1571)
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
Add FAQ entries:
+ What is the story with XFree86 being forked?
+ What is the story with XFree86's license?
- 1562, 1563, 1564, 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568
+ 1562, 1563, 1564, 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568, 1571
Update Brazilian Portuguese template translations (thanks, Andre Luis
Lopes). (Closes: #255963)
Modified: trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2004-06-24 16:22:23 UTC (rev 1570)
+++ trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2004-06-24 16:38:45 UTC (rev 1571)
@@ -426,8 +426,9 @@
conflicts, and in 2003 a group of developers resolved to set up a separate
development project, which was initially christened <code
class="other">xwin.org</code>, but later merged with an existing standardization
-project, <a href="http://freedesktop.org/";>freedesktop.org</a>. (Another group,
-<a href="http://www.xouvert.org";>Xouvert</a>, had also undertaken to fork the
+project, <code class="other"><a
+href="http://freedesktop.org/";>freedesktop.org</a></code>. (Another group, <a
+href="http://www.xouvert.org";>Xouvert</a>, had also undertaken to fork the
XFree86 codebase.) While this development was lauded by many redistributors and
feature-hungry end users, its short-term practical impact was fairly small. OS
distributors stuck with XFree86 because it was "ready" and it worked.
Reply to: