[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#218228: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: want debconf templates to educate the users about autoloaded submodules and other technological details of the XFree86 X server)



Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2004 12:05:19 +0200
with message-id <20040527100519.GD22363@foo.grottgera.kfs>
and subject line I see no reason to keep it open
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2003 21:25:30 +0000
>From arturcz@blabluga.hell.pl Wed Oct 29 15:25:20 2003
Return-path: <arturcz@blabluga.hell.pl>
Received: from blabluga.hell.pl [62.121.102.27] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AExoe-0004QQ-00; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:25:20 -0600
Received: by blabluga.hell.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 416AB1580B; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:25:19 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Artur R. Czechowski" <arturcz@hell.pl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: Please include r128 to drivers available under debconf
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:25:19 +0100
Message-Id: <20031029212519.416AB1580B@blabluga.hell.pl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-12.1
Severity: normal


It is impossible to choose r128 (ATI Rage 128) driver using debconf
templates. Could you include it in next package?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux blabluga.hell.pl 2.4.22 #1 Mon Oct 27 22:08:33 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL

Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.3.18     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.2-9    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xserver-common                4.2.1-12.1 files and utilities common to all 
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.1.4-16 compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 218228-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 10:05:50 +0000
>From arturcz@hell.pl Thu May 27 03:05:50 2004
Return-path: <arturcz@hell.pl>
Received: from ntwklan-62-233-201-238.devs.futuro.pl (kfstudio.com.pl) [62.233.201.238] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BTHlm-0001FV-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 03:05:50 -0700
Received: from arturcz by foo.augustowka.kfs with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BTHlH-0000wD-BJ
	for 218228-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 12:05:19 +0200
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:05:19 +0200
From: "Artur R. Czechowski" <arturcz@hell.pl>
To: 218228-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: I see no reason to keep it open
Message-ID: <20040527100519.GD22363@foo.grottgera.kfs>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: none
X-Operating-System: Linux foo 2.6.5foo
X-URL: http://hell.pl/arturcz/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 218228-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Hello X Team,
Because you tagged this bug as wontfix I see no reason to keep it open.
As a submitter of this bug I am closing it.

Cheers
	Artur



Reply to: