On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:46:20AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:29:57PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote: > [...] > > I might still have a copy of the file lying around somewhere (but the > > machine with the HHKB is currently not working, so I can't trivially > > find it), but obviously if there is a reason for it being removed then > > we should find out why first :-). > > I looked at these files, and this keyboard uses standard us definition, > only geometry is updated. Are these files really useful for you, or > are they just cosmetics to let some apps provide an accurate keyboard > snapshot? In the latter case, I am not sure that adding a patch to > xfree86 Debian packages is worth the pain, maybe you should submit these > files upstream? I don't have any objection to us applying such a patch. It's also worth noting that right now we don't really *have* an upstream for XFree86, thanks to the XFree86 Project, Inc.'s decision to relicense the source distribution under restrictive, GPL-incompatible terms. -- G. Branden Robinson | Damnit, we're all going to die; Debian GNU/Linux | let's die doing something *useful*! branden@debian.org | -- Hal Clement, on comments that http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | space exploration is dangerous
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature