On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:06:49AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:03:14PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > > Author: branden > > Date: 2004-04-19 12:03:13 -0500 (Mon, 19 Apr 2004) > > New Revision: 46 > > > > Added: > > vendor/AUTHORS > > Modified: > > vendor/ChangeLog > > vendor/Xcursor.h > > vendor/configure.ac > > vendor/xcursorint.h > > Log: > > Import Xcursor 1.1.3 (upstream CVS tag XCURSOR-1_1_3-RELEASE). > > Branden, > Please be very careful with these. Xcursor is fine, as it's a > modular-tree-native module, but note that I do not consider a release > official until tarballs have turned up - and right now, there are no > official tarballs for any module. > > 1.1.3 will not change, but others very well may as I complete the sync > from the monolithic tree (botched the header sync, which I'm still > sorting out). Er, perhaps I was confused. Is XCURSOR-1_1_3-RELEASE a branch tag or a release tag? I assumed it was the latter. If it was the former, I agree that this was a boo-boo. Does freedesktop.org not use the common CVS convention of appending the word "-branch" to branch tags? -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Please do not look directly into branden@debian.org | laser with remaining eye. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature