[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235046: uxterm: fails to display characters



* Michael D Schleif <mds@helices.org> [2004:03:10:09:56:21-0600] scribed:
> * Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr> [2004:03:10:09:27:27+0100] scribed:
> > MS> OK, I give up!  I use 9x15 almost everywhere.  Please, suggest
> > MS> alternatives that meet this criterion . . .
> > 
> > 9x15 is an alias for 
> > 
> >   -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-*-75-75-c-*-iso8859-1
> > 
> > You should use
> > 
> >   -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-*-75-75-c-*-iso10646-1
> > 
> > instead.
> > 
> > Yes, having to specify the encoding in the font sucks.  Fontconfig/Xfd
> > does away with this nonsense.
> 
> OK, I add this to ~/.Xresources :
> 
>    *font:  -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-*-75-75-c-*-iso10646-1
> 
> Then, I open a new uxterm, and do this:
> 
>    man spamassassin
> 
> That is my test manpage, one that consistently misbehaved in the past.
> Now, it still does *not* show leading dashes/hyphens.
> 
> How can I tell how a given uxterm window is configured?  Which font is
> it using?
> 
> What am I missing?

* Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr> [2004:03:10:17:02:36+0100] scribed:
> xrdb ~/.Xresources ?

Yes, of course!  Nevertheless, I am always confused whether -load or
-merge is appropriate; and, some attributes (e.g., charClass) do *NOT*
require any xrdb, &c.  Bottomline, this:

   xrdb ~/.Xresources

gave me some tiny, illegible font in all xterms.  So, I stopped, then
started kdm, and your -iso10646-1 font suggestion works as I desire.
Thank you.

Two (2) questions remain:

[1] Why am I confused by xrdb?  Why did it give me some _other_ font?

[2] Once I am in an xterm window, *HOW* can I query that window for its
    current configuration?

Thank you.

-- 
Best Regards,

mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: