[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Patches: 041-049



On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:45:39PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> And since you don't appear to have gotten to them yet....
> 
> 041_fix_Xlib_depend_target
> --------------------------
> Unchanged, renumbered to 017
> 
> 042_XtSetKeyboardFocus_manpage_fix
> ----------------------------------
> Upstream in 4.3.0.
> 
> 043_XF86VidMode_manpage_fix
> ---------------------------
> Upstream in 4.3.0.
> 
> 044_XtFindFile_manpage_fix
> --------------------------
> Upstream in 4.3.0.
> 
> 045_xconsole_saveLines
> ----------------------
> Upstream in 4.3.0.
> 
> 046_piclib_support
> ------------------
> Apparently merged into the new 909_debian_piclib_support.diff.
> 
> (It's a little hard for me to tell, because there seem to have
> been some design changes in the patch.  The changes to
> xc/config/cf/X11.tmpl and the changes to xc/lib/*/Imakefile
> to define DoPicLib for each library have vanished, but there seems to be
> a new generic method to turn on DoPicLib, which presumably replaces those.)

Yes; DoPicLib is now calculated instead of being explicitly specified in
a bunch of Imakefiles; this is cleaner (it also makes the patch easier
to forward-port, which is important since upstream rejected it).

> 047_fix_xfree86_man_version_string
> ----------------------------------
> Merged, renumbered to 007.  
> 
> 048_get_rid_of_xroot_in_manpages
> --------------------------------
> Appears to all be upstream in 4.3.0 (although I only did a spot-check;
> I didn't check every single file, but rather assumed that it was all
> committed on the same date.)

Yes, I remember submitting this, and it getting applied.

> 049_remove_duplicate_XShm_prototype
> -----------------------------------
> Committed upstream in HEAD *after* 4.3.0 was tagged,
> in revision 1.11 of xc/include/extensions/XShm_h ;
> not in upstream 4.3 branch.
> 
> Not in 4.3 patches.  Needs to be merged forward, preferably into
> 000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff.  Should apply basically unchanged.

Whew!

I've already thanked you a bunch, but thanks once more for your
ass-kicking efforts.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |       The only way to get rid of a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       temptation is to yield to it.
branden@debian.org                 |       -- Oscar Wilde
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: