[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#228494: [MAILER-DAEMON@deadbeast.net: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]



This person is not accepting mail for some reason.

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@deadbeast.net> -----

From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@deadbeast.net>
To: branden@deadbeast.net
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:04:14 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20040128030414.BF1426410B@redwald.deadbeast.net>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.63

Content-Description: Notification
This is the Postfix program at host redwald.deadbeast.net.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.

			The Postfix program

<harald.dunkel@t-online.de>: connect to
    mailin05.sul.t-online.de[194.25.134.74]: server refused mail service

Content-Description: Delivery error report
Reporting-MTA: dns; redwald.deadbeast.net
Arrival-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:59:28 -0500 (EST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; harald.dunkel@t-online.de
Action: failed
Status: 4.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; connect to mailin05.sul.t-online.de[194.25.134.74]:
    server refused mail service

Content-Description: Undelivered Message
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Bug#228494: 1400x1050
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:59:28 -0500
Message-ID: <20040123025928.GA14663@deadbeast.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:04:33PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I checked again: The problem (some thin vertical lines in text
> mode) comes up without running X, too. I would say the ati driver
> is innocent in this case. Probably a problem with 2.6.1. I
> will post it on the kernel list.

Probably so.  If X isn't even running, it's hard for something to be X's
fault.  :)

> Do you want a bug report about the broken XVideo support for
> 24bit? I got the impression that this is an already known
> problem.

Someone is already working on it, yes.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     My first priority in any attack is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     to solve the problem - not issue a
branden@debian.org                 |     press release.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Steve McInerney




----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |
Free Software Developer        |             If ignorance is bliss,
branden@deadbeast.net          |             is omniscience hell?
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: