[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NOTICE: XSF SVN repository back up



On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:47:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:07:37PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Which goes exactly with what I was trying to tell you on IRC (but was dismissed
> > by you).
> 
> You were "dismissed" because you had nothing to offer except grief and
> spite.  You made no effort at all to work with me to solve the problem,
> unlike Fabio and Warren, who did.

Um, I offered you the full output of svn on IRC (OFTC, not OPN - I pointed you
to OFTC), and got abuse in return. But whichever way you want to paint it, yeah,
that's cool. The fact I probably wasn't there to help you work it out may have
something to do with it, but last I saw, there was a very triumphial message on
how you had the permissions right, but ownership wrong.

> The repo is working again for all three of us, plus a dummy user I
> created for testing purposes.
> 
> Your mileage may vary, and if it doesn't I expect you'll conflate your
> problems with the previous ones, as you just did.

I cannot access the repo. It says "permission denied". I am running Subversion
0.29.0-1. Seeing as I cannot access necrotic to see what's going on, do you feel
like working it out, or should I just give up and start patchbombing the list
again?

> > Please fix this error, whatever it is, so others can continue committing to the
> > repository.
> 
> I needed assistance diagnosing it, and testing various solutions
> (unfortunately, the ultimate fix proved to be elusive; despite my
> efforts to be careful, which were documented on IRC, I was unable to pin
> down the exact cause of the problem), which you were unwilling to give,
> preferring to vent your spleen instead.

22:05 < DanielS> Overfiend: the. repository. is. still. stuffed.
22:05 < DanielS> Overfiend: 15:45 < wt> svn: No repository found in
'svn+ssh://necrotic/var/lib/svn/xfree86/branches/4.3.0'
22:05 < DanielS> 15:47 < wt> Permission denied
22:05 < DanielS> and I'm still having issues
22:05 < DanielS> feel free to claim said issues don't exist
22:07 < DanielS> svn, version 0.29.0 (r6976)
22:07 < DanielS>    compiled Sep  9 2003, 10:42:42
22:08 < DanielS> svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for
filesystem /var/lib/svn/xfree86/db:
22:08 < DanielS> Permission denied

That was after:
10:30 < DanielS> svn: Berkeley DB error
10:30 < DanielS> svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem
/var/lib/svn/xfree86/db:
10:30 < DanielS> Permission denied

Which was 48 hours ago now almost to the minute.

> If working conditions with the XSF SVN repo are unacceptable to you, you
> have other options.

Well, it's kind of difficult to actually work at all when I can't actually
access the repo. Do you want me to "'spoon' again"?

> Speaking for myself, I think the type of assistance that is required for
> Debian XFre86 package management goes far beyond the ability to
> petulantly bang one's fist against the table and piteously wail "it
> doesn't work!".

What, error messages aren't good enough? I apologize for my lack of ESP, and for
the fact that I'm not nicknamed "The BDB Whisperer".

> If you have something more to contribute, I look forward to it.  There
> is still much to be done for branches/4.3.0/sid, and I have updated the
> TODO file to note that fact.

I'm sure the list will welcome my patches, as it seems this is your solution.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                              <daniel@fooishbar.org>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pretty simple to implement"
  -- Havoc Pennington, gnome-list

Attachment: pgpPLcS1AaF_W.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: