Re: XSF revision 238
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 19:01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:12:44PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > IMO it's stupid to ship glu.h if we're not going to ship the rest of the
> > > library.
> >
> > This change doesn't ship it though, does it?
>
> Not in the package, but the fact that the upstream install rules think
> it's getting shipped smacks of cognitive dissonance.
Upstream is broken, it installs all GL/ headers if BuildGlxExt ||
BuildGLXLibrary is true.
> > > (Why can't XFree86 Build-Depend on libglu1-mesa-dev?)
> >
> > Actually, I think it'd have to Build-Depend on libglu-dev for glxinfo.
>
> Shouldn't those be the same thing, once GLU is killed off from XFree86's
> own tree?
I meant to stress the need, and that it could be any package providing
libglu-dev, should there ever be a reasonable alternative.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Reply to: