Re: XSF revision 238
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> rev 238: ishikawa | 2003-06-22 13:31:01 -0500 (Sun, 22 Jun 2003) | 8 lines
> Changed paths:
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.ia64
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.powerpc
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.s390
> M /branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.sparc
>
> update MANIFESTs (add usr/X11R6/include/GL/glu.h)
>
> usr/X11R6/include/GL/glu.h will be installed even if libGLU does not build.
>
> glu.h is included in xc/include/GL. Imakefile in xc/include/GL/ does
> not refer BuildGLULibrary YES or NO.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> IMO it's stupid to ship glu.h if we're not going to ship the rest of the
> library.
This change doesn't ship it though, does it?
> (Why can't XFree86 Build-Depend on libglu1-mesa-dev?)
Actually, I think it'd have to Build-Depend on libglu-dev for glxinfo.
> I object to killing off the X-forked GLU package at this point for that reason
> and others.
I'm looking forward to hearing them.
Anyway, I agree that the commit in this form was probably premature and
we should work this out in a branch first.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Reply to: