[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 69 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:54:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) Should libstdc++-dev dependencies be made "artificially" strict in
> packages destined for sid so that it's harder for packages built
> against, say, libstdc++3 to accidentally sneak in and start regressing
> the C++ ABI transition progress?

Well, this isn't a problem for buildds, because I made libstdc++5-dev
the preference.

> 2) Is libstdc++5-3.3 ABI-compatible with libstdc+5?  Does the former
> have any symbols that the latter lacks?

I *believe* it's completely ABI-compatible, but I could be wrong.

Daniel Stone 	     <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au>             <dstone@kde.org>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org

Attachment: pgp6kg0flBRMW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: