Bug#182704: Debconf configuration sets use_fbdev without asking, making X unstartable
On Fre, 2003-02-28 at 17:52, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:05:11PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Don, 2003-02-27 at 21:48, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:51:02PM +0100, Michel D?nzer <firstname.lastname@example.org> was heard to say:
> > > > daenzer@thor> wc -c /proc/fb ~
> > > > 0 /proc/fb
> > > > daenzer@thor> cat /proc/fb ~
> > > > 0 M9 Lf
> > >
> > > My, that's messed up..
> No, that's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect to see from /proc/fb.
Indeed, this is radeonfb on a Radeon 9000 Mobility aka M9.
> > > anyway, maybe I should have used the example
> > > where I tested [ -n $(cat /proc/fb) ] and it failed. How's this?
> > > torrent:~> cat /proc/fb
> > > torrent:~> od /proc/fb
> > > 0000000
> > > torrent:~> cat /proc/fb | wc -c
> > > 0
> The xserver-xfree86 config script interprets this as "kernel framebuffer
> device unavailable" -- isn't that correct?
Yes, it is.
> > Weird. Anyway, the test certainly isn't adequate because Option
> > "UseFBDev" doesn't work with generic framebuffer devices like vesafb,
> > OFfb, ...
> Could you propose a better test? What will /proc/fb say when someone is
> using a generif framebuffer device like vesafb, OFfb, and so forth?
> I can write the string parsing; just tell me what values I need to
Unfortunately, I don't know the output of all framebuffer devices by
heart either. :) Collecting some user data might be a good idea, but I'm
not sure how to best go about it.
> Also, I assume that anyone using a generic framebuffer needs to be using
> the "fbdev" XFree86 *driver*, right?
No, he can use a specific driver for his chipset or another generic
driver like vesafb if applicable.
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast