[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xlibmesa naming and relationships

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:29:36AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:31:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>  > Branden already answered you, and so did I. The significance lies in
>  > the major version. It's obviously meaningful to Mesa, if they
>  > continue to bump *major* versions, it must mean they're doing
>  > something pretty ... well, major, right?
>  Internal rewrites with no visible changes to the developer and
>  (hopefully) visible changes to the end-user.

If they don't want people to interpret that as "major", they shouldn't
bump the major version number when they do it.  :)

G. Branden Robinson                |
Debian GNU/Linux                   |           If existence exists,
branden@debian.org                 |           why create a creator?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpOILC1pfflo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: