Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> very rude thing to do to our users.
?? I did never read your messages as hostile. Yuo have been extremely
gently, polite and you made as well a perfect point that i have
underestimate.
>
> > Im working on pushing them to X.org and hopefully to get atleast an answer
> > back. If there will be no answer XFree86 will be the next step, and I
> > perfectly agree with you about a good deep review.
>
> IMO you should go XFree86 first. They are the leading implementation of
> the X Window System and have a reputation for being more responsive.
> They're certainly more open.
Thanks for the info. I tought it was the other way around X.org -> Xfree86
from one of the previous message, but it will cost me nothing to contact
them as well.
>
> > I leave up to you if you wish to close this bug or not. I do not mind
> > either way and for sure i'm not the one going to play tennis with BTS ;)
>
> I'm not going to close it right now. I'm tagging it "moreinfo". The
> info I need is:
>
> * Do these patches change the X protocol?
>
> If so, I will tag the bug "wontfix, upstream" and close it.
>
> If not, I might be willing to put then in a Debian package as long as I
> understand the impact.
Well that is the same idea I got also from other people. If the
implementation will be the same, Debian will be able to lead the testing
phase, but of course let's take a look to what will come out from Xfree86
first.
> Thanks a lot for working on this.
>
It's a pleasure trust me.
Fabio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+E/CrhCzbekR3nhgRAlEuAKCDTiOs9gmhYR+4x7DYdf2F6SjyHwCgg/uZ
LKGn49YxrMCvo5i8jqgRl/I=
=WHRs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: