[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#168601: default {x|g|k|w}dm: why not "disable" as a choice



On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:55:03PM -0300, John Lenton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > 
> > > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a
> > > potentialy dangerous surprise.
> > 
> > What's "dangerous" about it?
> > 
> > Having a sudden VT switch in the middle of your upgrade procedure is
> > also a surprise.
> 
> and also very bad news if you happen to have a getty on vt7, as you
> just lost the ability to use the machine locally.

Now, cut out that talkin' sense, boy; ol' Bloch has already made up his
mind.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      When dogma enters the brain, all
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      intellectual activity ceases.
branden@debian.org                 |      -- Robert Anton Wilson
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpnnf94UAVb9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: