[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#167775: xlibs: app-defaults is not a symbolic link



Package: xlibs
Version: 4.1.0-17
Severity: normal

Setting up xlibs (4.1.0-17) ...
Analyzing /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults:
drwxr-xr-x   16 root     root         4096 Aug 24 23:04 /usr
drwxr-xr-x    7 root     root         4096 Mar 14  2000 /usr/X11R6
drwxr-xr-x    8 root     root         8192 Nov  4 20:50 /usr/X11R6/lib
drwxr-xr-x   22 root     root         4096 Nov  4 20:50 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Nov  4 20:50 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults
ERROR: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults is not a symbolic link.  The package 
preinst script should have failed.
Please report the package name, version, and the text of the above error 
message(s) to <debian-x@lists.debian.org>.
dpkg: error processing xlibs (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libxaw7:
 libxaw7 depends on xlibs (>> 4.1.0); however:
  Package xlibs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing libxaw7 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of asmail:
 asmail depends on xlibs (>> 4.1.0); however:
  Package xlibs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing asmail (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xlibs-dev
 xbase-clients
 xlibs
 libxaw7
 asmail
Press return to continue.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux fanatic 2.4.19 #1 Mon Aug 26 18:23:02 CEST 2002 i686 Celeron (Mendocino) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages xlibs depends on:
iF  xlibs          4.1.0-17       X Window System client libraries
ii  libc6          2.2.5-14.3     GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libfreetype6   2.1.2-9        FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii  xfree86-common 4.2.1-3        X Window System (XFree86) infrastructure




Reply to: