[Anthony, are you subscribed to debian-x? I thought for sure you weren't.] On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 09:10:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'd marked that bug as applying to the version in testing way back before > woody was released. So either "no" or "it was already special cased". Oh ah. Is that marking visible in any publicly-readable file? > Because it's helpful to have the fact that there're RC bugs in the > unstable version coveniently available, whether they affect the move into > testing or not. Okay. I agree that the information is useful, but it's less clear that the message in question won't "hold up" a package's progress into testing. > You downgraded that bug on the 27th, at which point xfree86 would've been > uploaded for about eight days -- so it would've been "too young" to be a > valid candidate. I had the impression -- perhaps mistaken -- that "valid candidate" wouldn't have shown up anyway. -- G. Branden Robinson | Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount; branden@debian.org | fsck;more;yes;fsck;fsck;fsck; http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | umount;sleep
Attachment:
pgppnZ_MWRsHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature