On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:33:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for email@example.com: > > > severity 143825 serious > > Bug#143825: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? > > Severity set to `serious'. > Is it your intention not to let XFree86 4.2.1-3 propagate into testing > until I fix this bug? Huh? When update_excuses says, eg: + libcrypt-ssleay-perl (alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 <= 1) it's doesn't block the package from being considered. That was the case for xutils until you downgraded the bug. And in any event it already went in today, along with pam. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature