Re: ITITP: xprint (X.org)
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:28:32AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I think the assumption should be that XFree86 will eventually fix up its own
> Xprint server, in which case the X.Org version won't be "required".
Um, as a potential user (in the my-package-depends-on sense), it would
be nice if there were a virtual packagename (or something similar)
that I could depend on. Right now, the x.org version could provide
that dependency, and later, when/if the XF86 version gets fixed, it
could also provide the same.
Just a suggestion.
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long
email@example.com | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single
or firstname.lastname@example.org | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org