Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available
Okeley... shall I rebuild the current ones to be 4.1.0-0potato9, or can I
wait for 4.1.0potato10?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:06:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:36:20AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote:
> > * Charl P. Botha <firstname.lastname@example.org> [011108 16:35]:
> > > UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available.
> > > See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS
> > Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so if someone
> > uses a automated bug tool that branden can kill bugs with this version?
> Actually they should probably be numbered 4.1.0-0potato9 so that all
> woody versions compare higher than all potato versions.
charl p. botha | computer graphics and cad/cam
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/