On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 04:52:42PM -0700, Mark Montague wrote: > A possible temporary fix might be to put > > #define HasShm NO > > into the appropriate place in site.def / linux.cf and distribute the > .debs that way until it's fixed upstream. Of course, not doing this > will encourage more people to look for the bug... and I don't know if > XF86 will compile/work without SHM these days... Just thought I would mention (again) that this has been fixed upstream. Use phase2v10 or later. -- G. Branden Robinson | Never underestimate the power of human Debian GNU/Linux | stupidity. branden@debian.org | -- Robert Heinlein http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpoUamZPPRLh.pgp
Description: PGP signature