[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Build error on powerpc



Where'd this come from?

In file included from tseng_acl.c:9:
tseng_acl.h: In function `tseng_wait':
tseng_acl.h:136: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86ReadMmio32Le' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c: In function `tseng_terminate_acl':
tseng_acl.c:88: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:90: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:92: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:94: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:96: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c: In function `tseng_recover_timeout':
tseng_acl.c:105: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio32Le' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:108: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:109: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:110: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86WriteMmio8' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c: In function `tseng_init_acl':
tseng_acl.c:144: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86ReadMmio32Le' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:144: invalid lvalue in assignment
tseng_acl.c:145: warning: passing arg 1 of `xf86ReadMmio32Le' makes pointer from integer without a cast
tseng_acl.c:145: invalid lvalue in assignment

Etc.  Looks as if we lost a type somewhere...

Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|        SCS Class of 2002       |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __    Carnegie Mellon University   |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |       dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu      |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/



Reply to: