Timshell Knoll, never mail me again. Any further communication from a host
that throws away my mail will be regarded as spam and will be reported to
your ISP.
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@deadbeast.net> -----
From: MAILER-DAEMON@deadbeast.net (Mail Delivery System)
To: branden@deadbeast.net
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 13:58:52 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: branden@localhost.deadbeast.net
Delivered-To: branden@deadbeast.net
Message-Id: <20000907185852.4127F6700E@apocalypse.deadbeast.net>
Content-Description: Notification
This is the Postfix program at host apocalypse.deadbeast.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please contact <postmaster@deadbeast.net>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix program
<timshel@pobox.com>: host mxa.pobox.com[208.210.124.46] said: 554 Service
unavailable; [38.33.129.85] blocked using dul.maps.vix.com, reason: See
<URL:http://mail-abuse.org/dul/>
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
From: branden@deadbeast.net (Branden Robinson)
To: Timshel Knoll <timshel@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: X4 phase 2 packages issue ...
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 13:58:37 -0500
Message-ID: <20000907135837.A17632@deadbeast.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20000907224546.A2011@knoll.net>; from timshel@pobox.com on Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 10:45:47PM +1100
Please send mails like this to the debian-x mailing list.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 10:45:47PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Just attempting to apt your X4 phase 2 debs, and there seems to be an
> issue regarding xlib6g-dev. As xlibs-dev is replacing it, shouldn't
> it provide xlib6g-dev? dselect wants to trash half of my packages
> because they depend on xlib6g-dev (eg. libgtk1.2-dev, gstep-xgps0-dev,
> tk8.3-dev etc).
I'll see about fixing this for v2.
> Also, I have noticed that some of the packages you mention that are having
> problems with libxpm4 depend directly on xpm4g rather than libxpm4, so
> some of these problems could be fixed by making xlibs provide xpm4g.
> This won't work for packages with versioned dependancies on xpm4g,
> however, which include most of the packages that apt/dselect want to
> remove ... :(
Apparently you didn't read my announcement.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is a
Debian GNU/Linux | growing closer. It beats the hell out
branden@deadbeast.net | of card games.
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
----- End forwarded message -----
--
G. Branden Robinson | I have a truly elegant proof of the
Debian GNU/Linux | above, but it is too long to fit into
branden@deadbeast.net | this .signature file.
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpFaQjBee5Mh.pgp
Description: PGP signature