[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xfree86-1_3.3.4 now compiles on powerpc, mach64 mess fixed, patch included.



On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > 
> > > As I said before commenting that out will break sparc, please add "#ifdef
> > > __sparc__" around the function instead.
> > 
> > Huh ???
> > 
> > Ok, but it makes no sense to have regwbe for sparc in mach64im.c, and having
> > regw,regr and regwbe for other archs in regmach64.h.
> > 
> > NOt sure if it is the right place, since the functions will be copied over all
> > files that includes regmach64.h, maybe they are not counted, because they are
> > inlined function anyway.
> > 
> > Anyway, i made a patch that lets me compile 3.3.5 on ppc, and should be ok for
> > sparc also. Please check it, and if i made a mistake, correct it on the patch,
> > instead of saying it don't compile on sparc and thus should be rejected. I
> > understand that sparc is in stable and powerpc not, but that is not a
> > constructive way of handling things.
> 
> I never said it needed to be rejected, I just said add #if's around it, which was
> contructive and solved both problems. You cannot have it in regmach64.h even with
> the #if's around it for sparc, I tried it and it wont pick it up for some reason.

Maybe it would be better to solve that problem. regmach64.h is included from
mach64.h i think, into mach64im.c.

There is an #ifdef FBDEV around the whole regxxx stuff. Do you build an fbdev
server on sparc or a normal one ? There should be no reason it don't works.

Also one question is what kind of stuff will be included in the upstream source
? Are you also a xfree member ?

> 
> Please just have it to where it stays in mach64im.c with #ifdef __sparc__ around
> it.

If we cannot find another solution, i will do that.

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER


Reply to: