Re: loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/ page
Hi,
deploying the changing on packages.d.o is not the next step.
First, the changing has to be merged into the debian-master branch,
since that's used on packages.d.o.
Holger
Am 18. März 2025 20:24:14 MEZ schrieb Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>:
>在 2025-02-24一的 17:01 +0800，zhangdandan写道：
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am glad to receive your reply.
>> Thanks for your help and submission.
>>
>> 在 2025/2/23 下午11:51, Holger Wansing 写道:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > zhangdandan <zhangdandan@loongson.cn> wrote (Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:23:06 +0800):
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I checked that loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/
>> > > page.
>> > > For examples,
>> > > - dpkg
>> > > dpkg was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building
>> > > environment, please view
>> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dpkg&suite=sid.
>> > > But loong64 was not included in the end of the page
>> > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/dpkg.
>> > >
>> > > - apt and more packages in sid (unstable)
>> > > apt was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building
>> > > environment, please view
>> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apt&suite=sid.
>> > > But loong64 was not included in the end of the page
>> > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt.
>> > >
>> > > Please help to add loong64 in https://packages.debian.org/ page.
>> > I have created a merge request for this:
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/36
>>
>> Could maintainer help to review and merge the MR of loong64 support?
>
>I merged https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/35 ,
>but keep in mind that I do not have permission to touch any deployed packages.d.o instance.
>I still don't know who is in charge of code deployment. This is problematic.
>
>Thanks,
>Boyuan Yang
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Reply to: