在 2025-02-24一的 17:01 +0800，zhangdandan写道： > Hi, > > I am glad to receive your reply. > Thanks for your help and submission. > > 在 2025/2/23 下午11:51, Holger Wansing 写道: > > Hi, > > > > zhangdandan <zhangdandan@loongson.cn> wrote (Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:23:06 +0800): > > > Hi, > > > > > > I checked that loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/ > > > page. > > > For examples, > > > - dpkg > > > dpkg was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building > > > environment, please view > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dpkg&suite=sid. > > > But loong64 was not included in the end of the page > > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/dpkg. > > > > > > - apt and more packages in sid (unstable) > > > apt was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building > > > environment, please view > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apt&suite=sid. > > > But loong64 was not included in the end of the page > > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt. > > > > > > Please help to add loong64 in https://packages.debian.org/ page. > > I have created a merge request for this: > > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/36 > > Could maintainer help to review and merge the MR of loong64 support? I merged https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/35 , but keep in mind that I do not have permission to touch any deployed packages.d.o instance. I still don't know who is in charge of code deployment. This is problematic. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part