[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#703050: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please document the criteria for debian.net services to be integrated into debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:57:16 +0200
with message-id <25906.56220.792123.771943@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #703050,
regarding www.debian.org: Please document the criteria for debian.net services to be integrated into debian.org
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
703050: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703050
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were
integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but the criteria for deciding which
services would qualify is not documented.

Here's some suggestions that could be a useful start:

- there is consensus and/or evidence that the service is useful enough to
  warrant attention from d.o visitors

- the developer of the service is willing to stay around to maintain the
  service, and/or produce sufficient documentation for its maintenance

- the service's web site uses d.o's stylesheets and navigation, and meets the
  web team's accessibility requirements

- the web team feels comfortable to support the service from a security
  perspective (eg. because the site is a bunch of static HTML files, or
  if it's dynamic, it uses a stack that's considered acceptable)

- the original developer is willing to address any other concerns the web team
  might have

cheers,
sez

ps. my personal motivation for this bug report is wnpp-by-tags.d.n which I
    think would serve its purpose better by relocating to eg.
    www.d.o/devel/wnpp/by_tags and linked to from www.d.o/devel/wnpp

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Since 10 years noone worked on this bug and noone else seems to need
this documentation. Therefore closing.

-- 
regards Thomas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: