[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#924888: why bsd.license?

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:34:16 +0100 MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:26:13 +0200
> Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> wrote:
> > <q><strong><a href="misc/bsd.license">BSD</a></strong></q>, and
> > 
> > I have checked that the content of the bsd.license file matches the
> > BSD-3-Clause license at opensource.org, so I've updated the links to
> > 
> > https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
> > 
> > and removed the file.
> Could you add a redirect instead of breaking links from other
> documentation, please?  In line with Cool URIs Don't Change,
> https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html
> https://manpages.debian.org/testing/pal/vcard2pal.1.en.html could
> probably be fixed by us, as could the links from our wiki, but it looks
> like there are also links to it from code on github.

I've grep-ed throughout the entire webwml repository and replaced all
occurrences of misc/bsd.license with the link to opensource.org.

Besides, it's worthwhile to search through the entire Debian source code and
remove them to our best efforts:


Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: