Bug#924888: why bsd.license?

[Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org>]

Hello

This file is referenced in other pages from our website:

social_contract.1.0.wml:126:

"<strong><a href="misc/bsd.license">BSD</a></strong>", and

intro/free.wml:81:

<LI><A HREF="$(HOME)/misc/bsd.license">BSD style license</A>.

intro/license_disc.wml:61:

<LI><A HREF="../misc/bsd.license">BSD style license</A>.

legal/licenses/index.wml:67:

<li><a href="$(HOME)/misc/bsd.license">Modified BSD License</a>
(common)</li>

social_contract.wml:149:

<q><strong><a href="misc/bsd.license">BSD</a></strong></q>, and

I have checked that the content of the bsd.license file matches the
BSD-3-Clause license at opensource.org, so I've updated the links to

https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause

and removed the file.

Kind regards,


El 31/3/19 alas 21:39, Thomas Lange escribió:
> I wonder why bsd.license is needed in /misc, because it's not
> referenced except in the makefile
> 

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona