[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ok for applying my patches about bugs search forms?




Le 29/06/2016 18:33, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> a few months ago, I made a bug report
>> (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815239) with patch in
>> order to (IMO) improve the readability of the form for search of bugs
>> (https://www.debian.org/Bugs/).
> 
> This bug seems to be about the package search form, not the bug search
> form.

You're right. I didn't remember well what I've done :-/
The patches should improve the 2 forms on
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

> The search form here: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ is modeled
> directly on the search form which is present at the end of every
> pkgreport.cgi output.

I agree that the first form in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ ('Find a bug
by number') should follow the same structure. There is a patch attached
to this message to do it.

However, it seems you talk about the second form ('Select bug reports on
the WWW'). Is it right? What do you wish for this one ? It seems to be
ok for me.


Stéphane

--- index.orig.wml	2016-06-29 19:55:09.676484785 +0200
+++ index.wml	2016-06-29 20:07:53.856775569 +0200
@@ -37,11 +37,16 @@
   <a name="bugreport"></a>
   <form method="get" action="https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi";>
   <p>
-  <input type="text" size="9" name="bug" value="">
-  <input type="submit" value="Find">
+  Bug number: <input type="text" size="9" name="bug" value="">
+  <br />
   <label><input type="checkbox" name="mbox" value="yes"> as mbox</label>
   <label><input type="checkbox" name="trim" value="no"> show all headers</label>
   <label><input type="checkbox" name="boring" value="yes"> show boring messages</label>
+  <br />
+  <span style="margin-left: 5em;">
+    <input type="submit" value="Find">
+    &nbsp;<input type="reset" value="Reset">
+  </span>
   </p>
   </form>
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: