[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bad release in install documentation

El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió:
> Hi,
> Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> (2016-02-06):
>>>> Hello,
>>>> a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +0000, wrote:
>>>>> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in
>>>>> abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says
>>>>> about stable release.
>>>> It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch
>>>> installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I don't
>>>> know why. Www people, any idea?
>>> Because http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide
>>> It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under stable, and
>>> stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this point of my
>>> todo list yet.
>> For the time being:
>> Looking at 
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38
>> it seems, we have the same situation again now:
>> The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog does
>> not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings effecting
>> Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that:
>> all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and
>> all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'.
>> Am I correct?
>> If yes, could someone commit that, please !!!
> I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions.
> Anyone?

I've committed the suggested change.
I suppose now the install guide for stretch will appear in its place,
but I'm not sure if this will automatically retrieve the install guide
for jessie/stable in its place too...

I'll have a look at the log and the install guides in the website after
the next lessoften build.


Laura Arjona Reina

Reply to: