[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#780518: marked as done ([Website] translations of Debian Constitution)



Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:30:35 +0100
with message-id <20150327223035.069f36942504675e510e3aa9@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#780518: [Website] translations of Debian Constitution
has caused the Debian Bug report #780518,
regarding [Website] translations of Debian Constitution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
780518: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780518
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

It came to my mind if it would be legally correct, to mark translaions of
the Debian Constitution as translations and therefore as not legally valid?

Compare to the translations of the GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/translations.html


Holger

-- 
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
	D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> 
> > It came to my mind if it would be legally correct, to mark translaions of
> > the Debian Constitution as translations and therefore as not legally valid?
> 
> The Debian Project is not a legal entity and the Debian Constitution
> is not a legal document, just a set of rules the Debian Project
> governs itself by.
> 
> I think it is reasonable to have the constitution translated, as long
> as out-of-date translations are clearly marked. Currently they are not
> marked properly. I expect the outdatedness feature of the website
> needs to be adjusted to allow for per-page age preferences.

Ok, so this bug can be closed then, I think.


Holger

-- 
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
	D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================

--- End Message ---

Reply to: