Bug#780518: [Website] translations of Debian Constitution
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> It came to my mind if it would be legally correct, to mark translaions of
> the Debian Constitution as translations and therefore as not legally valid?
The Debian Project is not a legal entity and the Debian Constitution
is not a legal document, just a set of rules the Debian Project
governs itself by.
I think it is reasonable to have the constitution translated, as long
as out-of-date translations are clearly marked. Currently they are not
marked properly. I expect the outdatedness feature of the website
needs to be adjusted to allow for per-page age preferences.