[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2+ ?

Le 21/01/2012 12:28, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:08:55 -0400 David Prévot wrote:

> I would use the classical Expat URL for the Expat/MIT license:
> Moreover, as far as the Expat license is concerned, I would not talk
> about any "latest version",

Thank you Francesco for your remarks, attached patch and built page
updated accordingly:



Index: license.wml
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/license.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.27 license.wml
--- license.wml	8 Jan 2012 21:57:38 -0000	1.27
+++ license.wml	21 Jan 2012 16:55:40 -0000
@@ -10,6 +10,22 @@
+Since @@day@@ January 2012, the new material can be redistributed
+and/or modified under the terms of the <a href="legal/licenses/mit">\
+MIT (Expat) License</a> (which is usually available at
+<url http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt>) or, at your option, of the
+<a href="legal/licenses/gpl2">GNU General Public License</a>; either
+version 2 of the License, or any later version (the latest version is
+usually available at <url http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>).
+Work is in progress to make the older material compliant
+with the above licenses. Until then, please refer to the
+following terms of the Open Publication License.
 <p>This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set 
 forth in the Open Publication License, Draft v1.0 or later (you can
 read our <a href="opl">local copy</a>, the latest version

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: