[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#636785: marked as done (updates to http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-advocate to welcome non-packaging contributors)

Your message dated Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:29:59 +0200
with message-id <20110808122959.GB1871@zouish.org>
and subject line Re: updates to http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-advocate to welcome non-packaging contributors
has caused the Debian Bug report #636785,
regarding updates to http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-advocate to welcome non-packaging contributors
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
636785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Tags: patch

On 08/05/2011 12:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> 
>> Any thoughts on how it should be updated to reflect last year's GR?
> 
> Once you have better wording, checkout the webwml CVS and submit a
> bug/patch against www.debian.org.
> 
> http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs

Proposed patch attached for the english version below.  Thanks for
pointing me in the right direction, pabs.

	--dkg

Index: nm-advocate.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/join/nm-advocate.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 nm-advocate.wml
--- nm-advocate.wml	13 Jun 2010 10:42:44 -0000	1.9
+++ nm-advocate.wml	5 Aug 2011 22:01:58 -0000
@@ -7,12 +7,37 @@
 <p>You should <em>only</em> advocate someone if you think that they are
 ready to be a developer. This means that you should have known them for
 some time and can judge their work. It is important that prospective
-developers have been working in the project for some time, by maintaining
-a package, helping users and sending patches. They should be familiar
-with Debian's special ways of doing things and have contributed some
-work to the project. Just ask yourself if you want to see them in Debian
-&ndash; if you think they should be a Debian developer then go ahead and 
-recommend them.
+developers have been working in the project for some time.  Some ways
+prospective developers might be contributing include:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>maintaining a package (or several),</li>
+<li>helping users,</li>
+<li>publicity work,</li>
+<li>translations,</li>
+<li>organizing work for debconf,</li>
+<li>sending patches,</li>
+<li>contributing bug reports,</li>
+<li>... and much more!</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>These ways of helping are not mutually exclusive, of course!  Many
+prospective developers will have done work in several areas of the
+project, and not everyone must be a packager.  Remember, <a
+href="http://www.debian.org/vote/2010/vote_002";>Debian welcomes
+non-packaging contributors as project members</a>.  For a wider
+overview of a given contributor, you may be interested in <a
+href="http://ddportfolio.debian.net/";>tools which aggregate some
+publicly-visible parts of the project</a>.  Your personal knowledge of
+the applicant is also important here.
+</p>
+
+<p>The prospective developer should be familiar with Debian's special
+ways of doing things and should have already contributed actively and
+effectively to the project.  Most importantly, they should be
+committed to the ideals and structure of the Debian project.  Ask
+yourself if you want to see them in Debian &ndash; if you think they
+should be a Debian developer then go ahead and recommend them.
 </p>
 
 <p>Next carry out the following steps: Agree with the prospective developer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Daniel,
I've just commited your patch with changes suggested by Enrico: the new
version of the page will be visible in few hours.

Thank you for reporting it (and obviously for the patch too ;) ),

Francesca

-- 
<taffit> eof: when I want something | "Convince people with results,
done quickly, I don't wait for      |  rather than words"
others ;)			    |  Enrico Zini

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: