Hi there! On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:33:20 +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:55:03AM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> >> Is there any interest in automating this (in this case I will come back >> with a patch) or is the manual intervention needed for a specific >> reason? >> > > Yep, I admit that is very annoying. > I was working on something to automating the addition of "past_event" tag: [...] > Let me know if you want to take a look at the incomplete piece of script > I already have or if you prefer to write something ex-novo. Please share it somewhere (even privately), I prefer not to reinvent the weel. However, I was thinking about something which completely removes the need to add the "past_event" tag. So the question I forgot to ask is: what is the rationale for this tag? Should not the mechanism that adds this tag be added to index.include? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpf9cavNOrel.pgp
Description: PGP signature