Re: Bug#505254: www.debian.org: Ability to sort RFP/ITP pages by age
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Le 22/04/2011 10:20, Justin B Rye a écrit :
> David Prévot wrote:
>> Actually I intended to keep the first form too (and use the second form
>> if and only if the number of day in preparation is at least two and the
>> number of day in activity is different):
>>>> - <package: description>, in preparation since today.
>>>> - <package: description>, in preparation since yesterday.
> Oh, well, I suppose as long as the readers are looking for information
> instead of borderline-arguable nits to pick it'll be fine...
Sure, the main goal is to have the ability to spot if WNPP are being
worked on. If the bug has been reported yesterday, and someone updated
it today, we can claim without hurting anyone (in a page that claims to
be updated daily) that it is worked on since yesterday without further
notice. The interesting part is to be able to spot that someone did
update a bug report two weeks ago, even if the bug has initially been
reported five years ago.
> as long
> as your algorithm never gets confused by timezones and starts claiming
> "since tomorrow".
;-). “tomorrow” is not part of the usable strings, and people took care
before me to provide a reliable way to count those days, I didn't
reinvent the wheel here.
>> I may push a link on *organized by age*
>> and *organized by activity* instead of offering many lines:
>> - - %s packages being worked on, organized by age or organized by activity
> - - %s packages being worked on, organized [by age] or [by activity]
Indeed better, thanks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----