Bug#505254: www.debian.org: Ability to sort RFP/ITP pages by age
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Le 22/04/2011 04:42, Justin B Rye a écrit :
>> I'd propose something like:
>> - <package: description>, %s days in preparation, last activity today.
>> - <package: description>, %s days in preparation, last activity yesterday.
>> - <package: description>, %s days in preparation, last activity %s days ago.
> An improvement on "since today"... but do you need to make that "%s
> day(s) in preparation"?
Actually I intended to keep the first form too (and use the second form
if and only if the number of day in preparation is at least two and the
number of day in activity is different):
>> - <package: description>, in preparation since today.
>> - <package: description>, in preparation since yesterday.
See for example my WIP test pages:
What would you suggest to replace the “since today” form?
>> Also, for the index, I hope the following would be fine:
>> - %s packages being worked on, by age
>> - %s packages being worked on, by last activity
> Maybe ", organi[sz]ed by", just to get further away from the old jokes
> about "a list of people broken down by sex and age"...
Let's go with “organized” then, this form seems a bit more used than the
other on the website (almost 59%, well I guess that we could try and
push some consistency in that regard, but it will be in another thread).
Second though, in order to avoid a fair amount of lines linking to the
various new pages being offered, I may push a link on *organized by age*
and *organized by activity* instead of offering many lines:
- - %s packages being worked on, organized by age or organized by activity
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----