Your message dated Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:02:54 +0100 with message-id <20081214230254.GE8209@dedibox.ebzao.info> and subject line Re: Bug#508733: www.debian.org: No weblinks to project homepages in packages.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #508733, regarding www.debian.org: No weblinks to project homepages in packages.debian.org to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 508733: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508733 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: www.debian.org: No weblinks to project homepages in packages.debian.org
- From: Raphael Frey <freyraphael@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:16:12 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20081214201612.11690.79658.reportbug@debian>
Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist There are no external web links to the official project home pages of each package on http://packages.debian.org. I do not see why the Debian project should obscure the originators of the packages and I do not think that there is any rational reason. Without these links you also do not know where you can download the current source code without downloading the deb file. Furthermore Debian takes credit for the packages/programmes without having created them. Ubuntu for example provides such links (see e. g. http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/gnome/abiword) but Debian does not. Also other distributions do not provide such links but I think Debian could be a pattern to these distributions. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 508733-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Raphael Frey <freyraphael@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#508733: www.debian.org: No weblinks to project homepages in packages.debian.org
- From: Simon Paillard <simon.paillard@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:02:54 +0100
- Message-id: <20081214230254.GE8209@dedibox.ebzao.info>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1229289175.3302.213.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20081214201612.11690.79658.reportbug@debian> <[🔎] 1229289175.3302.213.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 09:12:55PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 21:16 +0100, Raphael Frey wrote: > > There are no external web links to the official project home pages of > > each package on http://packages.debian.org. > > There are, but it's up to the package maintainer whether to include the > information - see http://packages.debian.org/sid/samba for instance. [...] Statistics show there is a good amount of packages with such a link : $ zgrep -c "^Homepage:" Sources.gz 5859 $ zgrep -c "^Package:" Sources.gz 12959 > Encouraging package maintainers to include upstream information is a > reasonable goal, but the lack of such information is not a failing in > packages.debian.org, nor in Debian itself (and, as mentioned, nor is the > fact that different packages include the information in Debian and > Ubuntu a point in either's favour or disfavour). Raphael, on top of Adam's words, you can submit patches for the packages that miss the "Homepage:" pseudo-field (the one used by packages.debian.org to create a link to the upstream project). Maybe a lintian warning would be relevant in order to convince developpers to use this field. Though, there are already : http://lintian.debian.org/tags/description-contains-homepage.html http://lintian.debian.org/tags/bad-homepage.html See http://bugs.debian.org/444336 as well. > In summary, I do not believe there is a bug here. Me neither :-) -- Simon Paillard
--- End Message ---