Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by joy: webwml/english/CD/vendors adding-form.wml
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:44:37PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > * Your form does not make a distinction between CDs and DVDs. vendors.CD
> > has a <cdtype> and <dvdtype> distinction, although it's not used much. But
> > IMHO, not distinguishing between different media on our vendor page is
> > fine! (Same goes for <VendorRelease>.)
> I modelled the form page (adding-form) after the instructions page (adding),
> so if you think that those should be added, why not commit it to the
> original page?
Well, IMHO it's fine if this information is not listed on our page...
> > I'm interested! :)
> I'd be happy to add you to the cdvendors alias, just send me the
> preferred address.
Please use email@example.com - thanks!
> > If the others don't mind the "CD vendor spam" too much, maybe we could keep
> > using debian-www for this? (Or debian-cd, or another public mailing list.)
> Well, the problem here is e-mail spam. Even if we do publish the sales
> e-mail address legally, we don't tell people that their submission From:
> address will also end up in the public list archive even if it is different
> from the sales address.
There will be no submission "From:" if people use the web form.
Additionally, you can antispamify the address in the body of the mail, e.g.
by replacing the @ with a space.
> I hear you on the "select club" issue. Currently, the mails are received
> at master and archived at www-master, and that machine isn't available to
> all developers to log into - AFAIR? This way, someone needs to be both a
> developer and has to request the login privilege over there in order to
> read the old mailbox which is located at
> /org/www.debian.org/mail/cdvendors Are those two hurdles too much?
IMHO, yes. I didn't know where to find the cdvendors mbox, nor that there
was an archive at all.
I think it's more likely that someone else picks up the job if they are a
regular debian-www subscriber and see lots of unprocessed vendor requests.
*shrug* But you could also make the submission script output a message
which tells the submitter to contact firstname.lastname@example.org if their request is
not processed within a week or two.
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key: 888354F7
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 08A9 7B7D 3D13 3EF2 3D25 D157 79E6 F6DC 8883 54F7
¯ '` ¯