On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> This is OT on this list. I guess debian-project or debian-devel would be more appropriate, if any
> (depends on how you ask).
Someone told me this too in private. Since buildd.d.o is a web
interface, my first thought was to ask here.
Well, you know, on debian-devel, whatever the way you ask something
about a hot topic, it will launch a flamewar with no result.
By the way, debian-project is for non-technical issues in the project.
I apologise if I was a little carried away by saying violation of
Social Contract. In deed, someone pointed me out that "components
of the Debian system" did not cover "components of the Debian
infrastructure". Therefore, the fact that buildd.d.o is *not* Free
Software is totally normal.
Cheers.
--
((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---.
`--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \
.-'( )`-. Unix Sys & Net Admin \.@-@./
`~~`@) (@`~~` /`\_/`\
| | .''`. // _ \\
| | : :' : | \ )|_
(8___8) `. `'` /`\_`> <_/ \
`---` `- \__/'---'\__/
BOFH excuse #340: Well fix that in the next (upgrade, update, patch
release, service pack).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature