Bug#339837: http://www.debian.org/security/ seriously misleading about security infrastructure performance
Filipus Klutiero <cheal@hotpop.com>
> If someone doesn't agree that this is an order of magnitude too
> optimistic, I'll point to http://lwn.net/Articles/149976/
That article is known to contain basic errors. See, for example,
http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2005/09/09
indolence log, by Anthony Towns
or the comments from the article, even.
> Actually, "Debian takes security very seriously." is just a questionable
That's a bit low.
> statement, but giving a statistic that wrong about it just kills
> credibility.
Please explain how you know that the statistic is "that wrong".
I think the statistic is questionable, so there should be
verification/substantiation of the statistic, but I don't know
whether it's right or wrong. I think it's prejudging things to
delete the first paragraph as suggested.
Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask
Reply to: