Re: Bug#321896: Incorrect security info on AMD64 page
On Monday, August 08, 2005 2:15 AM, Ross Combs <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The security support for the AMD64 port is still (apparently) not
> in place.
This is not the case - see
> "Goswin von Brederlow answered this question in
> 'We are waiting on James Troup to activate amd64 on the security
> servers. The buildd is otherwise setup and running.
That may well have been the case in early July. It has not been the case
since at least last week, when the announcement was made.
> That mailing list post was a month ago. It doesn't appear the
> security servers will activate amd64 any time soon so it would be
> better to update the documentation to not point to them for AMD64.
The security team and the ftpmaster of amd64.debian.net disagree on both
points, as per the d-d-a post I referred to earlier. Therefore I'm closing
already contains a binary-amd64 folder, although admittedly it currently
only contains arch-all packages)