Bug#275909: marked as done ([RO][l10n]translation in ro is messed up)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:25:28 -0800
with message-id <20050212212528.GD2725@localhost.localdomain>
and subject line Bug#275909: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#275909: Please fix 275909)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2004 22:51:49 +0000
>From ip428u@camin11c.sexypenguins.com Sun Oct 10 15:51:49 2004
Return-path: <ip428u@camin11c.sexypenguins.com>
Received: from unresolved.rdstm.ro (camin11c.sexypenguins.com) [82.77.146.149]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CGmXd-00081G-00; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:51:49 -0700
Received: from kandia ([172.16.65.14])
by camin11c.sexypenguins.com with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CGmYt-0001kz-00; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:53:07 +0300
Message-ID: <4169BD4A.1040509@camin11c.sexypenguins.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:52:58 +0300
From: eddyp <ip428u@camin11c.sexypenguins.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040918)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org
Subject: [RO][l10n]translation in ro is messed up
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hello,
I am reporting some problems with the RO translation of the Debian site:
consider -> to be "should be replaced with"
problems:
www.debian.org
"Å?tiri sÄ?ptÄ?mînale" -> "Å?tiri sÄ?ptÄ?mânale"
"Package-uri" "Pachete" (for first letter lowercase too)
" e-mail sÄ?ptÄ?mînal" -> " e-mail sÄ?ptÄ?mânal"
"nou se întîmplÄ?" -> "nou se întâmplÄ?"
"sînt anunÅ£ate, subscrieÅ£i" -> "sunt anunÅ£ate, înscrieÅ£i-vÄ?"
"este mai mult decît un simplu OS" -> "este mai mult decât un simplu OS"
"alte limbi decît engleza" -> "alte limbi decât engleza"
"altele decît Intel x86" -> "altele decât Intel x86"
"despre ce s-a întîmplat în" -> "despre ce s-a întâmplat în"
and last, but not least,
"sistemul de exploatare universal" -> "sistemul de operare universal"
This last bit is the most ugly as it says "the universal exploiting sistem"
basically a script that does
s/sînt/sunt/ everywere and
s/(..*)î(.*.)/$1â$2/ should be sufficeint.
Thank you.
please cc me, I am not on the list
--
Regards,
EddyP
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275909-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 21:26:27 +0000
>From kraai@lafn.org Sat Feb 12 13:26:27 2005
Return-path: <kraai@lafn.org>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D04mU-0000H7-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:26:27 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (host-66-59-246-5.lcinet.net [66.59.246.5])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1CLPi2d022426
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:25:56 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from kraai@lafn.org)
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D04lc-0001Qk-V6; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:25:30 -0800
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:25:28 -0800
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
To: Eddy Petrisor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>, 275909-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20050212212528.GD2725@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20050210164431.GC2791@localhost.localdomain> <4169BD4A.1040509@camin11c.sexypenguins.com> <handler.275909.D275909.110811406210819.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 420CE98D.4020508@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cQXOx3fnlpmgJsTP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 420CE98D.4020508@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kraai@lafn.org
Subject: Re: Bug#275909: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#275909: Please fix 275909)
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:51:04 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on localhost.localdomain)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.82, clamav-milter version 0.82 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: 275909-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
SUBJ_HAS_SPACES autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--cQXOx3fnlpmgJsTP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> reopen 275909
> tag 275909 wontfix -patch
> thanks
>=20
> Please do not ignore this problem.
This decision is up to the Romanian translation coordinators. Since
they've decided to stick to the current orthography, this isn't a bug,
so it should be closed. If you can convince them to change their
mind, feel free to reopen or refile this bug. Please don't do so
otherwise, though.
--=20
Matt
--cQXOx3fnlpmgJsTP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCDnRIfNdgYxVXvBARAuwJAKCzWycejewR7n6qjPGKjMGPTG2aDQCglso3
aCt30IoRtBxGCKI2CgHSNXQ=
=HYUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cQXOx3fnlpmgJsTP--
Reply to: