Re: A few more typos ...
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 11:13:31PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> True, there were some issues I didn't dare to touch thus effectively
> leaving this to more proficient readers of the English language. Some
> parts of your patch are included in what I mentioned in
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2004/09/msg00028.html>[0], some
> more proposals are included as well.
> Please check all this when you have the time, and I promise it's the
> last time I bring this up. :)
OK, I checked your patch but I'm not sure about:
Index: devel/testing.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/testing.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 testing.wml
--- devel/testing.wml 29 Feb 2004 22:24:28 -0000 1.19
+++ devel/testing.wml 2 Sep 2004 08:55:57 -0000
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
consequently won't be released in "stable".</p>
<p>The "testing" bug count for a package is considered to be roughly the bug
-count at the last point when the "testing" version equalled the "unstable"
+count at the last point when the "testing" version equaled the "unstable"
version. The bugs tagged <strong><current_release_name></strong> or
<strong><current_testing_name></strong> will not be counted. Bugs with the
<strong>sid</strong> tag will be counted, though.</p>
I know that unequalled is Brit. and unequaled Amer. style but equalled isn't contained in
http://dict.leo.org or the ding package (and I'm sure you use the same dictionaries as I).
Also s/inofficial/unofficial/ is not wrong but also not absolutly necessary.
Since nobody complained yet and most parts of your patch are OK I suggest that you apply it.
It's always possible to revert small parts ...
Jens
Reply to: