Hello list, hello Luk! Thanks for the rapid reply. On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 12:05:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Florian Ernst wrote: > > Apparently it was not acceptable, and at least one person was / is > > seriously annoyed by the amount of similar messages coming in, so I > > propose the attached change to devel/website/using_cvs.wml. > > Well, I was also a bit annoyed by the amount of messages. Thanks, that's good to know. I guess I was only contacted by a single person since this person was the only one who actually knew off-hand how to contact me. > > Unfortunately things have already happened and as the very same person > > has used the term "abuse" please check whether I have violated the > > DMUP (I guess "wilful, deliberate, reckless or unlawful act > > interfer[ing] with the work of another developer" and "Mail Bombing" > > _could_ apply here) or any other document. > > But I don't think it is a "Mail Bombing" or such, nor did it interfere > with my work (I don't know of interference with anybody elses work), so I > don't think you violated the DMUP. Do you think there is any other written document whose practices I might have violated? If not, do you know of any practices that ought to be written down? The web site and Debian as a whole is IMHO quite well documented, but maybe there are some gaps that need to be filled (speaking generally here, not referring to this case)... > I second the proposed patch and I hope you keep doing your analyses. Thanks, and I apologize for the inconvenience. Cheers, Flo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature