On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:29:00AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The link to the BSD license under DFSG 10 goes to the revised BSD > license. The DFSG written before the revised license; it should go to > the original one with the advertising clause (unfortunately). Ugh, don't fix this bug this way. We should instead atempt to pass a general resolution that either: 1) Ensures we're talking about the 3-clause (or better yet, 2-clause) BSD license in DFSG#10. 2) Repeal DFSG#10 altogether (as discussed on -legal recently). If we're going to endorse a license in the DFSG, the least we can do is endorse the most desirable variant of it. -- G. Branden Robinson | The more you do, the more people Debian GNU/Linux | will dislike what you do. branden@debian.org | -- Gerfried Fuchs http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature