[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#227052: marked as done (www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken)



Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:09 +0100
with message-id <20040113002707.GE2601@djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2004 18:47:43 +0000
>From rich@devaul.org Sat Jan 10 12:47:10 2004
Return-path: <rich@devaul.org>
Received: from dev-zero.devaul.net (dev-zero.devaul.org) [209.58.153.94] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Af3CS-0004MB-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:25:44 -0600
Received: from rich by dev-zero.devaul.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Af3Co-0003Xg-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:26:06 -0500
From: "Richard W. DeVaul" <rich@devaul.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:26:06 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Af3Co-0003Xg-00@dev-zero.devaul.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-09
Severity: important

The download form for the fftw3 and fftw3-dev packages are broken.
Clicking on the "i386" button, for instance, results in the following message:

Method Not Allowed
The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL /cgi-bin/download.pl.

Apache/1.3.26 Server at packages.debian.org Port 80

This suggests that the packages.debian.org server is misconfigured.
If so, this problem is likely to affect more than just these two
packages, and perhaps all packages served through the www.debian.org
interface.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dev-zero 2.4.22 #2 Thu Dec 25 08:07:48 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227052-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 05:56:03 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Mon Jan 12 23:56:02 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AgCP5-0001dP-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:27:31 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1AgCP1-0002cx-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:27 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AgCOm-0002ln-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:12 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:09 +0100
To: "Richard W. DeVaul" <rich@devaul.org>
Cc: andrel@U.Arizona.EDU, 227052-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken
Message-ID: <20040113002707.GE2601@djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] E1Af3Co-0003Xg-00@dev-zero.devaul.org> <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.33.0401111609210.24198-100000@bast.u.arizona.edu> <[🔎] 16385.57723.387509.892575@dev-zero.devaul.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 16385.57723.387509.892575@dev-zero.devaul.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 227052-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 06:51:23PM -0500, Richard W. DeVaul wrote:
> I tried it again a few minutes ago and I'm no longer getting the
> error, so it was either transient or fixed when packages.d.o was
> restored.
> 
Then I will close the bug.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: